Full-speed recording of 233 JPEGs or 107 RAW frames is possible. Sony A6400 and Sony A6300 are ranked for five distinct photography categories in this part so that you may make your selection simpler if you are especially interested in one or more of these areas. Let’s compare the Sony A6400 and A6300 from the top. I’d love to know which camera you possess or intend to purchase and why you’re doing so. Also, feel free to ask any questions about the cameras in the comments section, and I’ll try my best to answer them.
It has an Sony Alpha a6400 vs Sony Alpha a6300 LCD screen with a 180-degree tilt.

Additionally, there are many less buttons on the back of this camera than on any of the previous models. For the most part, the control layouts of the three models are almost similar. In contrast, both the a6300 and a6400 only feature one unique button on the top panel of the a6500.

Instead of Sony A6500,
Instantly, the camera will concentrate on the topic and retain it there. Because of a newly created algorithm that analyses spatial information based on color, distance, pattern, and facial and eye information at high speed in real time, this is conceivable. – The new real-time tracking capability of the a6400 trumps the other four cameras, including the range-topping a6500. For stills or videos, Real-time Tracking may be activated by merely touching the screen.
In comparison to the a6300 and a6500, the a6500 has 425 contrast detection areas. Because both cameras have 24.0MP APS-C sized sensors, sensor size and resolution are indistinguishable between them. Please be aware that pricing may vary from store to retailer, and that special offers may be available at any time of year. Therefore, these prices should only be used as a reference when shopping about. To find the best discounts, use the price comparison links at the conclusion of this page.

Larger sensors are more costly, and they lead to larger and heavier cameras and lenses as a side effect of this. Similar to subsequent generations, this camera is equipped with a 24-megapixel sensor with a similar design. Still shooters won’t have a problem with the reduced quality of the viewfinder and the fact that it only shoots 1080p rather than 4K. Sony’s autofocus mechanism is rudimentary by today’s standards, yet it nevertheless competes well with those of competitors.

Sony A6400 and Sony A6300 are compared in a quick overview here before we go into the more in-depth comparison. The menu systems of the a5100, a6000, and a6300 aren’t the most user-friendly in the world. With the debut of the a6500 and even more enhancements with the a6400, the menu system received some much-needed upgrades.
The a6400’s improved AF system and 11fps burst speed, when coupled, might make it an intriguing low-cost wildlife camera. In order to provide a more objective and consistent comparison, our Decision Algorithm dynamically rates cameras using 69 various specifications, current pricing, and DxO Mark ratings. There are Tilting displays on both cameras so that you may easily film from waist or above-the-head heights with ease. Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the Sony A6400 and A6300 from the rear.

Both models have touchscreens, although only the A6400 is touchscreen-enabled. For example, touch control may be quite useful in adjusting the focus point. The side-by-side comparison of the Sony A6300 and A6400 below shows how big and heavy each camera is. They are arranged in relation to one another based on their size. There are three successive views from the front, top, and rear. Our rigorous testing of the a6500 found that the 5-axis stabilization mechanism wasn’t class-leading, and that optical stabilization alone provides a substantial benefit.